Search
The main objective of this study 'DETUMBLING – Investigation of Active Detumbling Solutions for Debris Removal' was to propose and investigate a contact-based de-tumbling strategy using a robotic arm. Realistic models were developed for the chaser with robotic-arm, target and composite systems. Specific GNC strategies were developed for the different phases of the mission: robotic-arm deployment synchronisation with the target de-tumbling the composite.
GMV
The objective of this document is the presentation of the final synthesis of the activity “HIPNOS”, Development of a representative HW/SW solution for a high-performance processing platform for Active Debris Removal missions. Implement COTS-based solution as Demonstration of the activity.
HIPNOS includes trade-off study of processing technologies, processing space-grade and COTS devices, processing architectures, trade-off for computer vision algorithms, and demonstrator of the selected solution.
The scope and objectives of the activity are:
GMV
Spacecraft and their payloads are required to meet a casualty risk threshold for uncontrolled re-entries. The requirements demand that consideration be paid to the whole spacecraft and payload in order to achieve an optimised mission that is not penalised, where possible, by the cost of performing a controlled entry. The demisability of the spacecraft bus has received significant attention in recent years, the demisability of payloads has received less focus.
Fluid Gravity
Low Earth orbit (LEO) is experiencing a renaissance thanks to increasing commercialisation of space. The opportunities provided by small satellites are enabling diminutive companies and startups, in particular, to make a significant impact on the space economy. Small satellites have played a vital role in this revolution and they have a unique ability to bring around new products and services at short timescales and for relatively low-cost.
University of Southampton
The population of non-operational objects in the space environment is raising, increasing concern about the safety of operations for current and future space activities. In this respect, space agencies and in particular ESA with its ESA/ADMIN/IPOL (2014) have established policies to mitigate space debris creation. Please refer to the compendium of space debris mitigation standards adopted by states and international organizations, [RD.5], for additional information. This basically implies that satellites in LEO and GEO shall perform an End Of Life (EOL) disposal with a reliability of 90%.
GMV
In the future, satellites will have to demonstrate compliance with debris mitigation requirements, covering re-entry or parking graveyard orbits and passivation. Nevertheless, during the mission, a failure could occur without any possibility to manoeuvre the satellite and achieving its compliance to the Space Debris Mitigation requirements. Therefore to anticipate the need to use ADR for deorbiting (or reorbiting) the satellite, it is interesting to evaluate the implication of adapting the satellites and launcher upper stage to support a future ADR mission.
Thales Alenia Space
Filter by programme:
Filter by start year:
Filter by end year:
Filter by keywords:
- (-) Remove Space debris filter Space debris
- ADR (4) Apply ADR filter
- LEO (2) Apply LEO filter
- Reentry (2) Apply Reentry filter
- Simulation (2) Apply Simulation filter
- AOCS (1) Apply AOCS filter
- Avionics (1) Apply Avionics filter
- CleanSpace (1) Apply CleanSpace filter
- Cubesats (1) Apply Cubesats filter
- Demisability (1) Apply Demisability filter
- Design for Removal (1) Apply Design for Removal filter
- Dynamics (1) Apply Dynamics filter
- EOL (1) Apply EOL filter
- GNC (1) Apply GNC filter
- Material (1) Apply Material filter
- Passivation (1) Apply Passivation filter
- Payload (1) Apply Payload filter
- Re-entry (1) Apply Re-entry filter