Search

3 results found
Environmental aspects of passive de-orbiting devices

The technical objective of this study was to understand the net effect of using deorbiting technologies like sails or tethers over the future debris population around Earth. In principle, indeed, these attractive technologies will support the compliancy to post-mitigation disposal guidelines, for small missions. However, the increased cross section also increases the collision risk.

Italy

15/095

Politechnico di Milano
Clean Sat technology assessment and concurrent engineering in support of LEO platform evolutions

In this activity, LSI's Airbus, OHB and Thales Alenia Space evaluated CleanSat technologies.

Italy

15/M61-c

Thales Alenia Space
Design for Removal: How to design S/C to support active debris removal if uncontrolled

In the future, satellites will have to demonstrate compliance with debris mitigation requirements, covering re-entry or parking graveyard orbits and passivation. Nevertheless, during the mission, a failure could occur without any possibility to manoeuvre the satellite and achieving its compliance to the Space Debris Mitigation requirements. Therefore to anticipate the need to use ADR for deorbiting (or reorbiting) the satellite, it is interesting to evaluate the implication of adapting the satellites and launcher upper stage to support a future ADR mission.

Italy

15/705-b

Thales Alenia Space

Filter by programme:

Filter by start year:

Filter by end year:

Filter by keywords:

Filter by contractor:

Filter by country:

Filter by application domain:

Filter by competence domain:

Filter by technology domain:

Filter by status: